IPE 400 vs HEB 400

Steel section comparison · IPE / HEB · EN 10365

  • IPE 400 is 57 % lighter than HEB 400 (66.3 vs 155.3 kg/m).
  • HEB 400 has 2.5× higher strong-axis stiffness Iy.
  • HEB 400 has 8.2× higher weak-axis stiffness Iz, which governs columns and lateral stability.
  • HEB 400 has 147 % higher plastic bending resistance (Wpl,y).
  • Per kilogram of steel, HEB 400 is the more efficient bending section (Iy/G: 371 vs 349 cm⁴ per kg/m).
PropertyIPE 400HEB 400
Height h [mm]400400
Flange width b [mm]180300
Web thickness tw [mm]8.613.5
Flange thickness tf [mm]13.524.0
Area A [cm²]84.5197.8
Mass G [kg/m]66.3155.3
Moment of inertia Iy [cm⁴]23 13057 680
Elastic modulus Wel,y [cm³]1 1562 884
Plastic modulus Wpl,y [cm³]1 3073 232
Moment of inertia Iz [cm⁴]1 31810 820
Radius of gyration iy [mm]165.5170.8
Radius of gyration iz [mm]39.574.0
Torsion constant It [cm⁴]50.4361.1
Warping constant Iw [×10³ cm⁶]482.93 751.1

Highlighted value = the favourable one (higher stiffness/modulus, lower mass). Full property sets on the profile pages.

Explore further

Disclaimer: All content, data, and calculations on this website are provided "as is" for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not warrant that the content is complete, up-to-date, or free of errors. The content does not constitute professional advice and must be verified against the official applicable standards by a qualified person. Use of this data is strictly at the user's own risk, and we accept no liability for any direct or indirect damages resulting from its use.