HEA 320 vs HEB 320

Steel section comparison · HEA / HEB · EN 10365

  • HEA 320 is 23 % lighter than HEB 320 (97.6 vs 126.7 kg/m).
  • HEB 320 has 34 % higher strong-axis stiffness Iy.
  • HEB 320 has 32 % higher weak-axis stiffness Iz, which governs columns and lateral stability.
  • HEB 320 has 32 % higher plastic bending resistance (Wpl,y).
  • Per kilogram of steel, HEB 320 is the more efficient bending section (Iy/G: 243 vs 235 cm⁴ per kg/m).
PropertyHEA 320HEB 320
Height h [mm]310320
Flange width b [mm]300300
Web thickness tw [mm]9.011.5
Flange thickness tf [mm]15.520.5
Area A [cm²]124.4161.3
Mass G [kg/m]97.6126.7
Moment of inertia Iy [cm⁴]22 93030 820
Elastic modulus Wel,y [cm³]1 4791 926
Plastic modulus Wpl,y [cm³]1 6282 149
Moment of inertia Iz [cm⁴]6 9859 239
Radius of gyration iy [mm]135.8138.2
Radius of gyration iz [mm]74.975.7
Torsion constant It [cm⁴]108.8229.2
Warping constant Iw [×10³ cm⁶]1 482.62 026.2

Highlighted value = the favourable one (higher stiffness/modulus, lower mass). Full property sets on the profile pages.

Explore further

Disclaimer: All content, data, and calculations on this website are provided "as is" for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not warrant that the content is complete, up-to-date, or free of errors. The content does not constitute professional advice and must be verified against the official applicable standards by a qualified person. Use of this data is strictly at the user's own risk, and we accept no liability for any direct or indirect damages resulting from its use.