HEA 160 vs HEB 160

Steel section comparison · HEA / HEB · EN 10365

  • HEA 160 is 29 % lighter than HEB 160 (30.4 vs 42.6 kg/m).
  • HEB 160 has 49 % higher strong-axis stiffness Iy.
  • HEB 160 has 44 % higher weak-axis stiffness Iz, which governs columns and lateral stability.
  • HEB 160 has 44 % higher plastic bending resistance (Wpl,y).
  • Per kilogram of steel, HEB 160 is the more efficient bending section (Iy/G: 58 vs 55 cm⁴ per kg/m).
PropertyHEA 160HEB 160
Height h [mm]152160
Flange width b [mm]160160
Web thickness tw [mm]6.08.0
Flange thickness tf [mm]9.013.0
Area A [cm²]38.854.3
Mass G [kg/m]30.442.6
Moment of inertia Iy [cm⁴]1 6732 492
Elastic modulus Wel,y [cm³]220312
Plastic modulus Wpl,y [cm³]245354
Moment of inertia Iz [cm⁴]616889
Radius of gyration iy [mm]65.767.8
Radius of gyration iz [mm]39.840.5
Torsion constant It [cm⁴]11.831.2
Warping constant Iw [×10³ cm⁶]30.646.7

Highlighted value = the favourable one (higher stiffness/modulus, lower mass). Full property sets on the profile pages.

Explore further

Disclaimer: All content, data, and calculations on this website are provided "as is" for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not warrant that the content is complete, up-to-date, or free of errors. The content does not constitute professional advice and must be verified against the official applicable standards by a qualified person. Use of this data is strictly at the user's own risk, and we accept no liability for any direct or indirect damages resulting from its use.